Aberdeen vs Nottingham
Nottingham wins on purchasing power. Nottingham foundation doctor (fy1/fy2)s have £207/month more disposable income after rent than their Aberdeen counterparts.
After paying rent, a foundation doctor (fy1/fy2) in Nottingham retains £207/month more than in Aberdeen — that's £2,484/year extra in purchasing power.
Aberdeen vs Nottingham: what the £207/month gap means for a foundation doctor (fy1/fy2)
On paper, Aberdeen foundation doctor (fy1/fy2) roles pay £0/year more than Nottingham. But take-home after tax and National Insurance tells a different story — Aberdeen workers keep £2,510/month versus £2,517/month in Nottingham.
The bigger picture is after rent. Average Aberdeen rent runs £1,050/month versus £850/month in Nottingham. Once housing costs are factored in, Nottingham workers have £1,667/month disposable income versus £1,460/month in Aberdeen — that is £2,484/year in real spending power.
Nottingham's rent-to-income ratio of 34% compares favourably to Aberdeen's 42%.
For foundation doctor (fy1/fy2)s prioritising financial freedom, Nottingham delivers significantly more disposable income despite comparable gross pay.
Cost-of-living equivalence
Based on a cost-of-living index of 73 for Aberdeen and 63 for Nottingham, a salary of £37,068 in Aberdeen delivers equivalent purchasing power to £32,000 in Nottingham.
Income retention after all essentials
% of net monthly pay remaining after rent, transport, council tax and groceries
Everyday costs
Estimated typical prices · scaled from Numbeo 2025
Financial tools
Popular products for UK earners