London vs Aberdeen
Aberdeen wins on purchasing power. Aberdeen foundation doctor (fy1/fy2)s have £973/month more disposable income after rent than their London counterparts.
After paying rent, a foundation doctor (fy1/fy2) in Aberdeen retains £973/month more than in London — that's £11,676/year extra in purchasing power.
London vs Aberdeen: what the £973/month gap means for a foundation doctor (fy1/fy2)
On paper, London foundation doctor (fy1/fy2) roles pay £2,000/year more than Aberdeen. But take-home after tax and National Insurance tells a different story — London workers keep £2,637/month versus £2,510/month in Aberdeen.
The bigger picture is after rent. Average London rent runs £2,150/month versus £1,050/month in Aberdeen. Once housing costs are factored in, Aberdeen workers have £1,460/month disposable income versus £487/month in London — that is £11,676/year in real spending power.
Aberdeen's rent-to-income ratio of 42% compares favourably to London's 82%.
For foundation doctor (fy1/fy2)s prioritising financial freedom, Aberdeen delivers significantly more disposable income despite lower gross pay.
Cost-of-living equivalence
Based on a cost-of-living index of 100 for London and 73 for Aberdeen, a salary of £39,068 in London delivers equivalent purchasing power to £28,500 in Aberdeen.
Income retention after all essentials
% of net monthly pay remaining after rent, transport, council tax and groceries
Everyday costs
Estimated typical prices · scaled from Numbeo 2025
Financial tools
Popular products for UK earners