Aberdeen vs Edinburgh
Edinburgh wins on purchasing power. Edinburgh marketing managers have £69/month more disposable income after rent than their Aberdeen counterparts.
After paying rent, a marketing manager in Edinburgh retains £69/month more than in Aberdeen — that's £828/year extra in purchasing power.
Aberdeen vs Edinburgh: what the £69/month gap means for a marketing manager
On paper, Aberdeen marketing manager roles pay £2,000/year less than Edinburgh. But take-home after tax and National Insurance tells a different story — Aberdeen workers keep £2,683/month versus £2,802/month in Edinburgh.
The bigger picture is after rent. Average Aberdeen rent runs £1,050/month versus £1,100/month in Edinburgh. Once housing costs are factored in, Edinburgh workers have £1,702/month disposable income versus £1,633/month in Aberdeen — that is £828/year in real spending power.
Edinburgh's rent-to-income ratio of 39% compares favourably to Aberdeen's 39%.
Cost-of-living equivalence
Based on a cost-of-living index of 73 for Aberdeen and 72 for Edinburgh, a salary of £40,000 in Aberdeen delivers equivalent purchasing power to £39,450 in Edinburgh.
Income retention after all essentials
% of net monthly pay remaining after rent, transport, council tax and groceries
Everyday costs
Estimated typical prices · scaled from Numbeo 2025
Financial tools
Popular products for UK earners