Glasgow vs Reading
Glasgow wins on purchasing power. Glasgow foundation doctor (fy1/fy2)s have £443/month more disposable income after rent than their Reading counterparts.
After paying rent, a foundation doctor (fy1/fy2) in Glasgow retains £443/month more than in Reading — that's £5,316/year extra in purchasing power.
Glasgow vs Reading: what the £443/month gap means for a foundation doctor (fy1/fy2)
On paper, Glasgow foundation doctor (fy1/fy2) roles pay £0/year more than Reading. But take-home after tax and National Insurance tells a different story — Glasgow workers keep £2,510/month versus £2,517/month in Reading.
The bigger picture is after rent. Average Glasgow rent runs £900/month versus £1,350/month in Reading. Once housing costs are factored in, Glasgow workers have £1,610/month disposable income versus £1,167/month in Reading — that is £5,316/year in real spending power.
Glasgow's rent-to-income ratio of 36% compares favourably to Reading's 54%.
For foundation doctor (fy1/fy2)s prioritising financial freedom, Glasgow delivers significantly more disposable income despite comparable gross pay.
Cost-of-living equivalence
Based on a cost-of-living index of 62 for Glasgow and 80 for Reading, a salary of £37,068 in Glasgow delivers equivalent purchasing power to £47,850 in Reading.
Income retention after all essentials
% of net monthly pay remaining after rent, transport, council tax and groceries
Everyday costs
Estimated typical prices · scaled from Numbeo 2025
Financial tools
Popular products for UK earners